What do you call a film which touts itself as a historical epic but omits key details in order to avoid telling the truth?

Most people would call it fantasy, but Hollywood calls it The Woman King.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: Viola Davis Says That Audiences Who Don’t See ‘The Woman King’ Are “Supporting The Narrative That Black Women Cannot Lead The Box Office Globally”

The textbook definition of ‘revisionist history’, The Woman King, at face value, is a film that brings to life the intersectional feminist’s wet dream of seeing a group of strong Black women portrayed as heroes against European slave traders.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

But in reality, this team up between director Gina Prince-Bythewood (The Old Guard) and screenwriter Dana Stevens (Fatherhood) should go down as one of the worst whitewashing of real-world history ever put to the silver screen.

Of course, that won’t stop The Woman King from being showered with awards next year, because as we all know, what a film represents is now far more important than its quality.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: Viola Davis Claims That In Order To Succeed In Hollywood “You Either Have To Be A Black Female Version Of A White Ideal Or You Have To Be White”

Set in the West African kingdom of Dahomey during the 1820s, “The Woman King follows an all-female group of warriors called the Agojie who protect the kingdom under the command of King Ghezo (John Boyeda), though he is a King in name only.

At the head of the Agojie is General Nanisca (Viola Davis), who trains the group’s members to fight against slave traders – European slave traders to be specific.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

Let’s pause here.

This attempt by Prince-Bythewood and Stevens to turn the Agojie and Dahomey into anti-colonial heroes who fought against enslavement and oppression by White people is the film’s biggest problem.

Why? Because it’s about as historically accurate as a Hanna-Barbera cartoon.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: ‘The Rings of Power’ Star Lenny Henry Implies Critics Of Amazon’s Race-Swapping Are Racist: “They Have No Trouble Believing In A Dragon But Can’t Accept That A Black Person Could Be A Hobbit Or An Elf”

In reality, the Dahomey were one of the most prominent slave trading states of their time.

According to History vs. Hollywood, the Dahomey not only “conquered neighboring African states and took their citizens as slaves, selling many in the Atlantic slave trade in exchange for items like rifles, tobacco, and alcohol,” but it was their engagement in this trade that “brought Dahomey most of its wealth.”

Source: Watch Warriors in Training in ‘The Woman King’ | Anatomy of a Scene, The New York Times YouTube

Regarding the Agojie themselves, the website notes that “The Agojie (women warriors) fought in slave raids along with the male fighters.”

“There are accounts of Dahomey warriors conducting slave raids on villages where they cut the heads off of the elderly and rip the bottom jaw bones off others,” History vs. Hollywood further details. “During the raids, they’d burn the villages to the ground. Those who they let live, including the children, were taken captive and sold as slaves.”

As best put the website themselves, “the movie strategically downplays this part of Dahomey’s history, so as to not complicate the story with the truth.”

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: Global TV Begins Production On Robyn Hood, Series To “Reimagine” Classic English Folk Hero As A Black Female “Gen Zer”

That’s right: the same Atlantic slave trade that modern progressives hold over the head of any person with white skin as some sort of ‘original sin’ is the exact same one that the real-world inspirations for The Woman King’s protagonists killed to protect.

Once you realize the narrative that the film presents intentionally side-steps the fact that the Dahomey were some of the worst slavers in not only African, but world history, the film as a whole just falls apart.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

Boyega’s King of Dahomey is emasculated by this woke fanfiction, as despite being an African king in the 1820s, his female soldiers are insubordinate to the point where it’s almost like they have themselves realized that they have ‘marginalized persons’ armor.

Not even the King’s own wife respects his authority. This is Feminist Storytelling 101 – a woman cannot be shown as being ‘equal’ to a man by her own merits, but only by tearing down men and making them look inferior.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: Disney And Marvel Face Massive Backlash For Using The Late Chadwick Boseman’s Twitter Account To Promote Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

(And while not exactly masculating, the idea that a ruler of such a region during this time period would allow LGBT people to serve in his court is equally as laughable.)

In an attempt to distract you from its blatant rewriting of history, The Woman King also gives you a story surrounding Nansica’s relationship with her daughter and the film’s unofficial protagonist, Nawi.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

Young, brash, and defiant of authority – a common theme in the film – Nawi defies her family’s plans for her in order to become a soldier for the King.

Unsurprisingly filled with melodrama, Nawi and Nanisca’s side story is only outdone in this regard by a later plot in which the former takes on a biracial Brazilian trader as a love interest – an angle that ultimately goes nowhere because heterosexuality isn’t allowed in progressive storytelling.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

RELATED: ‘She-Hulk: Attorney at Law’ Episode 5 Review – 20 Minutes Of Absolutely Nothing

Yet, in perhaps the most surefire sign that the film is a weak, woke blunder, Davis has fallen back on promoting the film by attempting to guilt audiences into giving it their attention by accusing anyone who doesn’t see it of “supporting the narrative that Black women cannot lead the box office globally“.

Maybe that narrative is true, or maybe the rest of the world just isn’t interested in giving money to Hollywood’s latest attempt to blame the 19th century for their own 21st century shortcomings.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

For obvious reasons, the comparisons between this and Marvel’s Black Panther franchise are inevitable, especially with the upcoming female led sequel, Wakanda Forever, having taken some inspiration from the Agojie for its titular African nation’s Dora Milaje.

However, the most damning one of all is the fact that Disney’s portral of the fictional Wakanda is more rooted in reality than anything The Woman King presents on screen.

Source: The Woman King (2022), Sony Pictures

Ultimately, the takeaway message of The Woman King is not to let the truth get in the way of a good narrative.

NEXT: ‘Black Panther: Wakanda Forever’ Star Tenoch Huerta Says Marvel Film’s Main Conflict “Portrays What Is Happening Here In The States Between Minorities”

'The Woman King' Review - A Fantasy That Runs From The Truth
PROS:
  • Costume Design
  • Fight Choreography
  • Cinematography
CONS:
  • Rewrites History In Order To Promote A Woke Narrative
  • Pigeonholed Storytelling
  • Bloated Runtime
2Overall Score
Reader Rating: (58 Votes)
0.3